BMGT 339 6381 Introduction to Federal Contracting (2168) UMUC Learning Management System

BMGT 339 6381 Introduction to Federal Contracting (2168) UMUC
Learning Management System

Evidence of critical
thinking (analysis,
synthesis, evaluation
and reflection) of class
reading material and
discussion
0.75 points
analysis, synthesis,
evaluation and
reflection is strongly
present across all
posts; rich in content
full of thought, insight,
and analysis (0.675 –
0.75)
0.65 points
analysis, synthesis,
evaluation and
reflection is present in
most posts – substantial
information thought,
insight, and analysis
has taken place (0.6 –
0.6725)
0.57 points
attempts analysis,
synthesis, evaluation,
and reflection but not
strongly evident or only
partially evident –
generally competent
information is thin and
commonplace (0.525 –
0.59)
0.5 points
analysis, synthesis,
evaluation, and
reflection is poorly
demonstrated or does
not exist; rudimentary
and superficial; no
analysis or insight is
displayed (0 0. 0.524)
Responses to
classmates and
instructor reflect a
substantive
understanding of
course material
0.75 points
responses to
instructor/classmates
are complete and
meaningful as required;
responses are relevant
and advance the level
and depth of the
discussion consistently
using course material
in the responses (0.675
– 0.75)
0.65 points
responses to
instructor/classmates
are complete and
meaningful as required;
responses are relevant
and advance the level
and depth of the
discussion occasionally
using the course
material in the
responses (0.6 –
0.6725)
0.57 points
responds to
instructor/classmates
meet requirements but
either a) responses lack
some detail to explain
answer; b) responses
do not add to the
conversation; c)
student does not use
course material; d)
student does not
respond to as many
peers as required or e)
lacks consistency in
responding to others
(0.525 – 0.59)
0.5 points
fails to respond to
classmate and/or
instructor as required;
responses are
superficial (I agree
statements, restating
what other student
stated; response that
evaluates the quality of
a student’s post adding
no substantial
comment) (0 – 0.524)
Relevance of
participation to topic
under discussion
0.75 points
contributions are
relevant and
demonstrates
outstanding
understanding of
material; uses various
course
material/resources in
responding, and
consistently and
accurately ties to
activity (0.675 – 0.75

Need Help Writing an Essay?

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your essay.

Write My Essay For Me